6.
The Filipinos, Circa 1989
"WHAT
WILL BECOME OF THE PHILIPPINES within a century?" you
asked near the beginning of your essay in 1889. "Will
they continue to be a Spanish colony?"
The
profound response you offered was two-pronged:
"Had
this question been asked three centuries ago, when at Legazpi’s
death the Malayan Filipinos began to be gradually undeceived and,
finding the yoke heavy, tried in vain to shake it off without any
doubt whatsoever the reply would have been easy. To a spirit
enthusiastic over the liberty of the country, to those
unconquerable Kagayanes who nourished within themselves the spirit
of Magalat, to the descendants of the heroic Gat Pulintang and Gat
Salakab of the Province of Batangas, independence was assured, it
was merely a question of getting together and making a
determination. But for him who, disillusioned by sad
experience, saw everywhere discord and disorder, apathy and
brutalization in the lower classes, discouragement and disunion in
the upper, only one answer presented itself, and it was: extend
his hands to the chains, bow his neck beneath the yoke and accept
the future with the resignation of an invalid who watches the
leaves fall and foresees a long winter amid whose snows he
discerns the outlines of his grave. At the time discord
justified pessimism — but three centuries passed, the meek had
become accustomed to the yoke, and each new generation, begotten
in chains, was constantly better adapted to the new order of
things.
"Now
then, are the Philippines in the same condition they were three
centuries ago?
"For
the liberal Spaniards the ethical condition of the people remains
the same, that is, the native Filipinos have not advanced; for the
friars and their followers the people have been redeemed from
savagery, that is, they have progressed; for many Filipinos
ethics, spirit and customs have decayed, as decay all the good
qualities of a people that falls into slavery, that is, they have
retrograded."
Now
then, how are the Filipinos one more century afterwards? Have we
progressed from the time you were writing of retrogression in your
essay, "The Philippines, A Century Hence"
exactly one hundred years ago?
A
growing number of Filipinos are beginning to enjoy at least the
marginal amenities of modernization even as they are increasingly
corrupted by the ways of crass commercialism, the better for
foreign big business to siphon out of their pockets and away from
their country the heard-earned fruits of their toils.
In
the overall view, let me offer the following summary of what our
country and our countrymen have been made to suffer:
The
Filipino has increasingly become the world’s most inexpensive
workhorse, notoriously overstaying ("tago nang tago")
alien and exotic prostitute, while the Philippines herself has
become the world’s hopelessly destitute and gullible mendicant
ready to sell out her own children along with their future in
exchange for high-interest morsels from international usurers.
At
home, the Filipino has become increasingly cynical of his neighbor
and even of himself, increasingly vulnerable to the temptations of
systemic corruption and injustice and pushed to be always on the
alert for the easiest shortcuts often at the expense of his peers.
Underneath the crackling laughter of ever-ready Filipino humor now
hides a tormented social psyche, with numbness and confusion about
the past, tears for the present and subdued agony, manifesting as
fatalism, over bleak prospects of the future.
In
your time, the people of these islands could not even be bound by
a common name. The word "Filipino" then applied to the
Spanish insulares, you spoke of us as Indios, and Bonifacio was
rallying the Katagalugan nation.35
By now, the name Filipino has come to be claimed by the population
of the Islands, save for pockets of minorities.36
But even as we have come to be known under a common label, we have
yet to be bound by a unified national consciousness, and rallied
by genuine leadership behind a common purpose for national
emancipation and betterment. And this has to be achieved against
formidable opposition from the "divide and rule"
approaches employed by our present-day indirect colonizers,
schemes that abet worsening fractiousness among our people push
the common man to rat-race individualism so detached from the
bayanihan spirit of his ancestors, and push his officials to
rat-level opportunism.
And
each generation, begotten in chains and nourished in the same
growing cynicism, is "constantly better adapted to the
new order of things." For many Filipinos, ethics,
spirit and customs have decayed, as decay all good qualities of a
people that remains in slavery.
As
if the levels of exploitation and oppression were not enough to
slaughter the populace gradually but surely, the country’s
nutrition, environment and health-care systems are as terminally
malignant as the prolonged social cancer you had diagnosed in your
time. Animals are cared for much better in rich countries than our
brother and sister Filipinos are here in their own land.
Destitution stalks the cities between the clusters of high-rise
buildings , between the flashy cars forced to stop for traffic
lights.
The
entire country itself is physically being destroyed slowly but
surely by greedy investors and merchants who denude our forests,
ship away our minerals, pollute our air and water, and poison our
soil. Moreover, we have come to live under the shadow of the very
real danger of so suddenly being blown off the face of the earth,
under this nuclear menace ironically labeled as a "security
umbrella."
And,
of course, if this nation reaches the abyssal rock bottom of
destitution and desperation before enlightenment can weld the
people together for positive action, gradual social decay can give
way to anarchy and total social destruction.
Progress
can never be measured in the increasing number of Filipinos who
can now ride automated stairways in comfortably cooled
superstores. How can anyone with the least intelligence mistake as
progress the collective debasement of our country and people in
both the material and the spiritual realms?
The
picture is not pitch black, however, for there are rays of hope as
there always have been, albeit often misrepresented as menacing
threats to public order, even as an unjust public order actually
deserves no defense. The situation draws eerie parallels with your
earier two-pronged response:
To
the descendants of Lapu-Lapu, Magalat, Diego and Gabriela Silang,
Dagohoy, Sultan Kudarat and the Filipino revolutionaries inflamed
by your writings and led by your contemporary Andres Bonifacio,
descendants who tried in vain to defend the independence we had
proclaimed upon the Spaniard’s defeat, heroic descendants who
kept up the struggle for national emancipation against American,
then Japanese, then American domination, descendants who have kept
aloft the big red banner of Bonifacio’s Katipunan albeit
emblazoned with some other symbols representing the impoverished
and downtrodden, noble descendants who have been constantly
maligned with facility by their enemies and misunderstood over
long periods of time by the masses in whose behalf they had
embarked on the road of extreme sacrifice, to these descendants
fidelity to the cause of national independence and salvation is
assured. It is merely a question of getting together and making a
determination all the way to complete success though be it much
easier articulated than accomplished.
But
for him who has been disillusioned by sad experience of our
subjugation by the Americans, overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude
and sophistication of this foreign master’s mind-controlling
mechanisms, disgusted over the behavior of our own compatriots who
have had their turn at the reins of government, and dissilusioned
by some instances of erratic and even unprincipled behavior
on the part of fighters for freedom, dis-illusioned over a
"people power" upheaval that turned out to be a
counterfeit revolution, or aghast over the seemingly irreversible
downtrend to public anarchy, mass apathy and worsening
destitution, only one answer presents itself, and it still is: "extend
his hands to the chains, bow his head beneath the yoke and accept
his future with the resignation of the invalid."
Today,
as in your time, Señor Rizal, the Philippines is at the
crossroads. You were asking then whether the Philippines would
remain a Spanish colony for still another century; present-day
Filipino as are now challenged to finally shake off the yoke of
foreign domination though be it cleverly concealed behind corrupt,
inept and tyrannical native rulers. The full century has passed
– it was not the Spanish sword and cross but the American
dollars, bombs and media that have held our country by the throat
all those one hundred years.
"History
does not record in its annals any lasting domination exercised by
one people over another, of different races, of diverse usages and
customs, of opposite and divergent ideals." Such was
your optimism for the cause of putting an end to foreign
subjugation of our country. The Spanish colonization of our
Islands lasted three centuries, but was defeated when our nation
stood as one to drive the arrogant conquistadores away. American
colonization of our
country is now
nearing its own century mark,37
but it has proved to be cleverly flexible in the forms
of subjugation, from bloody "pacification" that was no
less than genocide to the very sophisticated methods of
present-day semi-colonialism that can be very invisible over our
flag independence.
Present-day
students of history have been made to debate whether the country
needs more the revolution preached and led by Bonifacio or the
education that you preached for our people in your time. The
debate itself is flawed in its contraposition of what later proved
to be the two necessities of your period.
The
struggle against subjugation and tyranny, and education for
comprehending the problems and grasping the truths on the
solutions, are inseparable. Education for emancipation and
empowerment is already revolutionary and cannot be undertaken
under any wide-eyed benevolence on the part of overlords whose
interests are threatened by the spread of the truth. This
lesson can be derived unmistakably from your own fate – you who
did not take up arms were condemned just the same to be executed
for inspiring those who did.
[By
writing these lines, or by writing this piece at all, I may be
running the risk of being accused of abetting
"subversive" thoughts or efforts. The powerful may not
choose to grant me the honor of being punished the way you were,
Señor Rizal; but they may choose, anyway, to employ other means
to put me away – to silence my thoughts and still my pen. For
this reason, theoretically unreal in a fully civilized world where
ideas would be allowed to contend freely, this piece may be my
last, my "ultissimo adios." On the other hand, the
powers that be may just decide to simply dismiss or ignore me as a
crackpot.]38
The
struggle for our people’s liberation cannot triumph without
successful education reaching the majority of the populace. And
there would be unmistakable indications to show whether the
education effort is indeed successful.39
The
fact that there are hundreds of thousands of people effectively
enlightened on the basics of our problems and on the necessities
toward real solutions is already a commendable achievement of the
present-day Katipuneros especially in the past few decades. But
these hundreds of thousands are a mere handful in a population of
more than 60 million.40
Efforts
have been made to reach these millions. Ap-parently, however, much
of these efforts have so far fallen short of being effective. How
else explain the narrowness of purpose and low threshold of
euphoric satisfaction displayed in the struggle to depose one
ailing despot and in welcoming as replacement to his rule an
administration starkly identical to it in terms of fidelity to the
interests of the elite and even in manifestations of tyranny?41
How
else explain, indeed, the fact that the majority may be wont to
passively approve, or even actively advocate, the overextension of
American military presence in this country should the President
deem it to be consistent with "national interest" (that
is, should she be able to wangle a higher amount of bases-related
alms)? This, considering that the United States does not have to
invade us anymore, its troops are already here in tens of
thousands and they simply have to start shooting!
How
else explain the fact that in deference to the President’s
threatened-canary situation, a great number of people, including
supposed statesmen, would now readily let the incumbent
administration get away with having invited American military
intervention in the clearly-internal Filipino conflict between
factions of the local armed forces, an act that can eventually
lead to another full-scale invasion of our country?42
Considering
the value of effective education of the people as a component of
the struggle national and social emancipation, the situation calls
for a thoroughgoing evaluation and review of approaches and forms
used in this mass education effort – how readily is it received
and how clearly is it understood by the teeming millions upon
whose actions or inactions will decisively depend the shape of the
next decades and centuries.
As
for us, the rest of the people, we are challenged to cast away
all sorts of mental rationalizations for accepting our
overextended semi-colonial situation, and cast away, as well,
corrosive cynicism and paralyzing defeatism. We are challenged to
earnestly seek out one another to link-up-arms and work for real
solutions to the country’s festering and worsening woes. We are
called upon to transcend apathy and parochialism, the petty
rivalries, the mutual suspicions and prejudices dividing the
masses of our people, and stand up as one to face and win what
should be the final battle for the liberation of our country from
foreign domination,oppression and exploitation.
We
ought to meet this challenge squarely, unless we are willing to
risk having to ask the same questions again after still another
century – are we to remain bowed to the yoke of foreign
overlords for another hundred years, albeit with periodically
altered details in the specific arrangements?
This,
Señor Rizal, is the crossroads state of our Patria Adorada in
1989. This is your beloved Philippines, "a century
thence."
Manila,
Philippines
December
15, 1989
NOTES:
35Why
was Katagalugan (with Tagalog as rootword) chosen by Bonifacio and
the Katipunan as the apropriate name for the nation they were
birthing in 1896? Tagalog or Taga-ilog, which means people living
by the river, is actually a synonym of the self-adopted names of
many other communities in the entire archipelado, namely, Ilocano,
Ibanag, Pampango, Subanon, Subanen, Sugbuhanon (yes, the Cebuanos!),
and Tausug. The rivers not only strung up together the various
communities, being riverdwellers was one of the few obvious points
of commonality among the widely diverse communities of "The
Islands."
36Specifically,
these minorities are the tribal minorities, as the majority of the
indigenous peoples in the archipelago got effectively colonized
and are unmistakably covered by the label Filipinos. In the view
of these tribal groupings ("minority nationalities" or
"indigenous peoples" who have remained as such) and of
the Bangsamoro groups in Mindanao, such label is a burden of shame
to bear.
37Effective
colonization in the form of indirect subjugation may in fact last
two or even more centuries unless the majority of the people see
through the smokescreen of native political corruption and demand
an end to US domination.
38There
are many ways such elimination is being done left and right
nowadays. But the risk of eliminating me would be to inadvertently
make all my writings more widely read and more deeply valued by
the people. It may indeed backfire. Still, I have written and
included in this book a poem of fond farewell, "Mi
Primero Adios": Una Kong Pamamaalam, where I leave my
life mission's call for all to synergize and in that process seek
to use whatever useful lessons can be drawn from what i have
written. In effect the poem says: magsanib-lakás, Pilipinas!
Gamitin ang mga aral na mapapakina-bangan mula sa aking mga bakás
sa pinili kong landás! To at least some hearts this will
continue to whisper from my grave and the torch shall resume or
plainly continue being carried forward!
39If
the education efforts were indeed successful, the following would
already be a present-day reality instead of remaining as still
"my dream": Philippine society would be built by
self-driven and self-assertive active stakeholders who shall have
learned by heart to synergize efforts in everything they do for
the maximum impact of all such efforts, as facilitated by
servant-leaders who derive their motivation/inspiration from the
energies they are able to bring together and derive their
institutional and individual wherewithal mainly from the material
output of such synergies, and are not at all mainly moved and
enabled by salaries or allowances or by financial contributions
from external benefactors.
40This
was the official national population figure as of the writing of
this open letter in December 1989.
41There
were killings in various provinces (which I had ironically termed
"constitutional massacres"), after Aquino
"unsheathed the sword of war" at the close of peace
negotiations with the National Democratic Front, and asked the
armed forces to give her "A string of military
victories." There was a time she ordered restrictions in the
exercise of press freedom and explained she was doing so to
prevent an emergency (the Constitution allowed her to do so only
to address an existing emergency, not to prevent one). During her
term, the annual average of mediapersons getting killed was 36,
exceeding the equivalent Marcos dictatrorship figure of 32.
42The
Aquino government requested the US military to intervene in
containing a coup attempt, clearly an internal matter for
Filipinos to handle. There has also been an active and continuing
US involvement in fighting the "terrorists" in the
Mindanao island group, where much American economic, military and
geopolitical interests lie.
previous
top next |